BlacknTan
Well-Known Member
I just received my 175 x 50mm La Veinette from Maurice at Ardennes, and I'm very happy with it.
I've used the search, and the concensus seems to be that the stones are flat from Ardennes and require no initial lapping. The stone appears very flat and true. I checked it on granite, no rocking and it's flat on a straightedge. It has some fine radial scratches, but that appears to be the norm. So, I assume I don't need to lap with a DMT 325?
Next question... I also received a La Veinette bout as a slurry stone. i'm not aware of the differences in hardness of the different available layers, but would it be advantageous to get a slurry stone from a somewhat softer layer? My reasoning is that I'd rather wear the slurry stone bout for slurry production that the La Veinette stone. Is there enough difference in the relative hardness of the different layers to make this a viable option?
They say that the only stupid questions are the ones unasked, so I bit the bullet and asked...
Thanks in advance.
I've used the search, and the concensus seems to be that the stones are flat from Ardennes and require no initial lapping. The stone appears very flat and true. I checked it on granite, no rocking and it's flat on a straightedge. It has some fine radial scratches, but that appears to be the norm. So, I assume I don't need to lap with a DMT 325?
Next question... I also received a La Veinette bout as a slurry stone. i'm not aware of the differences in hardness of the different available layers, but would it be advantageous to get a slurry stone from a somewhat softer layer? My reasoning is that I'd rather wear the slurry stone bout for slurry production that the La Veinette stone. Is there enough difference in the relative hardness of the different layers to make this a viable option?
They say that the only stupid questions are the ones unasked, so I bit the bullet and asked...
Thanks in advance.