Paul
Well-Known Member
kinematic said:My comments should have cleared everything up if you read them carefully.
I've read your comments carefully... and they are crystal clear
kinematic said:My comments should have cleared everything up if you read them carefully.
Smythe said:Speaking of stones, two of the current lot in the Vault are way different from Coticule I have ever seen, the Wine-Red ones (n°41 and n°49) I believe Bart made mention about them.
Bart, are those Coticule or BBW? Anything more you can tell us about them?
This is incorrect. There's a particularly reddish and atypical specimen of the La Petite Blanche layer present in the Vault. When Maurice Celis showed it to me at the quarry, I made the same wrong assumption. Namely that this had to be a "Salmon Rouge". But he denied. According to Maurice, "Salmon Rouge" and "Pierre de Lorraine" are the same thing, namely a particular BBW-layer, with pretty fast abrasive action. They currently don't access that layer, but he handed me the last specimen out of the display cabinet in the entrance hall. It's the one obvious BBW in the Vault. Not for sale, but worth testing. I also received a very small sample of "Les Petas", another celebrated Coticule layer, that they currently don't have direct access to. In time, I'll shoot a picture and post about it. The Reddish "La Petite Blanche" has much lighter slurry that any of you would imagine. I'll share results when I'm finished testing. It is for sale, at a bargain price actually, because the layer slopes to zero at the other side of the hone.kinematic said:Those are BBW's if I'm correct. I've heard mention of some BBW layers with a more reddish appearance, these are supposed to be quite fast. I think they're called Salmon Rouge. One of my natural combo's also has a reddish BBW layer and it's faster than my "regular" BBW.
Very right, my friend. Apologies are an act of kindness, just like a cuddle or a present. These things loose all meaning when not freely given.Smythe said:Gentlemen!... he has stated his opinion and weather we like it or not, he is entitled to it, I would not bother to ask for an apology…. It is not necessary.
I had a change of heart, and told my pall Gary, who was looking for a large rectangular Coticule, to watch out for when n°54 became available. The hones were published in the Vault, for almost an entire day before I posted at the Cafeteria. Gary grabbed it. I practically told the same to Paul concerning n°52, and even agreed to reserve it for him because he had way more important matters at hand than claiming Coticules. But Victorious was alert enough to make a reservation before I posted about the addition to the Vault, and I will honor his request, just as I would honor it for every member. Yet I do hope that running this website still entitles me to do a friend a favor...Smythe said:Oh, and when will L#4, (aka n°54) be in the marketplace?:sneaky:
Your opinion that you're not interested in Coticules with qualification label, is yours to make, although I don't see your point for making it. If you're not interested, than just don't buy. But you tried to reveal this addition to Ardennes' line of products as a mere marketing ploy. "Misleading" was the literal word you used. Now, "marketing ploy" and "misleading", may be perfectly acceptable for you and the culture you live in, but I consider it not acceptable. Because it depends on deception. Having a euphemism for it doesn't make it less despicable. You suggested that there is no extra value in a Coticule with qualifications label, that it's a deception. And that remains an insult. Try it again, and you'll find out about my hospitality. That you frequent other Internet sites I've never heard about, but where - if I understand you correctly - people can't inhibit verbal incontinence, is something I couldn't care less about. Your objections, intermixed with your ill-mannered behavior, are noted here, as are all other replies. Everyone is free to form his own opinion out of that.kinematic said:We're all adults here and if Bart (or anyone else) can't handle it, it says more about him than it does about me. I will also encounter people during my life who will state an opinion I may feel is insulting to me. I'm not going to cry about it, that's life. Deal with it.
Actually you can't stick a label to a double sided Coticule. So the label in the lid of a box seems logical.kinematic said:boxing it up, numbering it, adding a description and selling it as a collectors edition
Bart said:"Misleading" was the literal word you used.
Now, "marketing ploy" and "misleading", may be perfectly acceptable for you and the culture you live in, but I consider it not acceptable. Because it depends on deception.
kinematic said:Saying they are both perfect coticules is also misleading because that's a very subjective statement.
The stone is gone? WOW that was fast, but I really didn't expect it to last long in the marketplace... with all those monitors and extra computers tasked to monitor the Vault and the Marketplace, Victorious beat me to it?... congrats:thumbup:Bart said:I had a chance of heart, and told my pall Gary, who was looking for a large rectangular Coticule, to watch out for when n°54 became available. The hones were published in the Vault, for almost an entire day before I posted at the Cafeteria. Gary grabbed it. I practically told the same to Paul concerning n°52, and even agreed to reserve it for him because he had way more important matters at hand than claiming Coticules. But Victorious was alert enough to make a reservation before I posted about the addition to the Vault, and I will honor his request, just as I would honor it for every member. Yet I do hope that running this website still entitles me to do a friend a favor... Bart.Smythe said:Oh, and when will L#4, (aka n°54) be in the marketplace?:sneaky:
Bart said:Yet I do hope that running this website still entitles me to do a friend a favor...
Not necessary.Victorious said:Bart said:Yet I do hope that running this website still entitles me to do a friend a favor...
Yes, of course. I had no idea that you had already reserved number 52 for someone. I'd be happy to relinquish my reservation to Paul, who technically had it before me anyway.
Bart said:By the way: You still have opportunity to recall your buyer's intent, by the time I post pricing info.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:Bart said:"Lucky Bastard"
Bart said:Hi Seth,
I haven't completed testing these.
Kind regards,
Bart