JimR said:
My, this is an interesting thread.
+1. Indeed it is.
JimR said:
There are a lot of good points here, on a lot of fascinating topics, but what I think interests me the most is Bart's conflagration of the forum mainstay "Acquisition Disorder" and Greed. On one hand, I think it is easy to see that people have a desire to have more and more. But on the other, I think there is in this hobby a desire not really for more stuff, but for more experience.
Let's just say that old-style shaving, in particular straight razor shaving, has a huge potential for «geekishness». It holds all the necessary ingredients: gear is important, skill is equally important, and most of us have a daily appointment with the restrictions of both. Because, let us admit it, how enjoyable and rewarding our shaves may be, there's always that margin for improvement luring around the corner. And that means: more skill to acquire, but also more gear to accumulate. So much for the exploration side of our hobby. In this realm I strongly believe in harmony: skill has to meet gear. I personally try not to buy more stuff, without properly exploring what I already own.
Then, as Jim pointed out so well, there's the Collector's aspect of the hobby. Also in this field, all conditions are met: many items are (relatively) rare, sometimes no longer in production. They have appealing aesthetics and can be admired for craftsmanship. And, not without importance, we can connect them to the aforementioned desire for exploration.
Yet, a true collector is a man with a plan. He knows what he's after, he knows where to look, and he knows how to await his chance. There's as much fun in the quest for an item as in acquiring it. In my mind, a true collector ought to be at ease with his hobby: he doesn't have to hide parts of it from his wife, nor does he need to seek confirmation from other guys with the same disorder. I believe a true collector cringes, when he finds his passion smudged by the term «disorder». And his heart bleeds when he sees the playground being overrun by people who proudly call themselves "Raddicts", and grab what they can, without any other plan than to grab what everyone else is grabbing.
(important disclaimer: there are gentlemen, who may have referred to themselves as "raddicts", but whom I consider to be genuine and honorable Collectors. To them I ask, were you truly that comfortable with calling yourself some kind of addict?)
JimR said:
Shaving is, let's face it, a terrible hobby. A hobby is something to devote time to, something to engage our minds and our bodies, and shaving can really only be done once a day (some special people can manage twice. I'm not one of those). So when people discover it, and realize that it can actually be enjoyable, they want MORE of that shaving joy -you see the newbie threads all the time. "I wish my hair grew faster!" "I want to shave three times a day!" etc.
I believe that it's a blessing, Jim. Passion dies without anticipation. Longing is an inseparable part of all things worth pursuing. I can't imagine being with my wife, if I couldn't long to be with her when she's absent. I can't imagine the fun of hiking in the Ardens, without my mind drifting longingly to it while staring out the window at work. I can't imagine liking bacon, if I ate it 3 times a day (eh.. well, bacon might be an exception
). And I can't imagine the virtues of a relaxed shave, if I had to do it 3 times a day. There doesn't exist a www.toothbrushplace.com, doesn't it?
JimR said:
I went through it, a lot of people here did as well, I'm sure. But as that enthusiasm can't be expressed through shaving, it must go somewhere, and so it turns to paraphernalia..."acquisition disorders". Trying and using and seeing what else is out there. For some, this turns into collecting--an interest in the things themselves, their aesthetics and their depth. For others, it is the pleasure of using something new, a love of novelty and exploration.
But of course, Jim. We're all in the same boat. I'm no misanthrope. Quite the contrary. But many forums (whether they concern guitar playing, model trains, audio equipment, shaving gear, etc.) tend to see overrepresentation of people who are (usually temporarily) on a buyer's high. As such (and I'm deliberately picking an example that not relates to shaving), it almost appears as if an owner of only one single guitar and amp is an abnormality, unfit to join any serious online conversation about his hobby. Little is done on forums to counteract this atmosphere and make the modest hobbyist feel at home. By publicly leaning over in the other direction with this forum, I hope to make a contribution for the better.
JimR said:
And finally, some people do in fact just get things to HAVE them.They take satisfaction in simply massing goods. Now, as for greed, I really only see it in this last one. Because enjoying experience or true collecting, is much more a hobby -learning and discovering is a GOOD thing. Simply having, though, is not a hobby, is not an interest, it is simply hoarding. So "Acquisition Disorder", as people use it, actually stands for several things--and only one of them is actually bad, as I see it. For of course, all of us have more than we actually NEED. One hone, one razor, one strop and one brush. That's it, as far as needs go. But there is so much more to know and enjoy out there, that having just one...well, it seems almost like self-denial. But that's just my take on it.
Allow me to answer the above quote with a little story. I was one of the early adopters of the Naniwa Chosera 10K. I've read great things about it, in statements made by a contributor on a woodworking forum, in whom I have good trust. I was in the market for a high grit synthetic at that time, got a very good deal at Rasurpur, so I ordered one. After about 3 weeks of using mine and making notes for a review I was writing, a fellow member at SRP bought one as well. He posted a very favorable review the next day, making all sorts of claims that I had no opinion about myself, because I had no idea how to base an opinion on my limited experience with it. And he made statements, that made me wonder if he was even talking about the same product. It became quite a long thread, in which he had answers for most questions. No superlative was spared to describe his beloved Chosera. 3 or 4 weeks later, he sold the stone in the classifieds...
The information will probably still turn up in a google search for Chosera + Straight Razor. But how much truth does it contain?
JimR said:
Then the vendor issue. This is a difficult point for me, because I do not at all view myself as a vendor, but I am very much viewed as one. I understand that, of course. I sell things. Thus, I am a vendor. But when I compare myself to those whose primary interest in this whole game is SELLING, I feel a very wide gap between them and me. I am not a salesman. I don't TRUST salesmen. I personally think having severe restrictions on vendors is a good idea, because if your products don't sell themselves, then your products don't need to be sold. Most people don't agree, and so they do everything they can to get people to buy -including all kinds of dishonesty. And of course, when the negative reports come in, they get defensive and personal, and things go downhill from there. Of course, the very fact of me saying this...well, let's just say that if I wasn't me, I'd not believe me either. Just like with the strop giveaway...I do not at all think of it as advertisement, but if someone says to me "That's really good advertisement for your strops" then I can't exactly argue with them.
I think problems usually originates where valid information gets mixed with promotional talk. Even in the above Chosera story, where the guy was not a regular seller, his statements about the product were obviously inspired by protecting the resale value of the item. Rest assured that one of our moderators will move the entire thread to the Marketplace, if something similar happens over here (Robin is correct: Coticule.be is small and therefor we can control such situations). Does this mean that the information will be less invalid in the Marketplace? No, but we trust that people know to read with different glasses when they visit the Marketplace. And, make no mistake about it, Coticule.be doesn't take any responsibility for items sold or exchanged in the Marketplace. If you buy a car with hidden flaws, from some guy you met at the pub, you don't blame the bartender for your mistake, do you? Of course, we do our best to maintain an honest platform: obvious dishonesty will be penalized, and the line between profit (Marketplace) and nonprofit (the rest of the Cafeteria) shall remain drawn. But that does not discharge anyone from
A. being honest and
B. being wary.
----
Someone said that we will grow and eventually allow advertising to support the website. Maybe so, but I will be retired when that happens. Advertisements are annoying, and in the end the consumer pays for them, in the prices of the advertised products. One could argue that this happens anyway, because one sponsored website more or less isn't going to make much difference. This is correct. The same is true for cars and air pollution. We all choose to start or stop being idealistic at an arbitrary line. Coticule.be was founded out of idealism. We do not need to sustain anyone's family. So we have the luxury of being able to adhere to some idealism.
Kind regards,
Bart.