The nutters are the ones who bring progress. Which, I might add, is the only adjustable I can get great shaves with.
Very good point. The museum analogy is fantastic. Here is where I see the limits of it. Museums have all sorts of grants, revenues and donations in money or assets.
Us, we have to rely on revenues generated from hard work. We have to be prudent and not fall into "a fool and his money".
Musea too have a budget. Agreed, these budgets at times get supplemented by funds from who knows where, but budget it is. In that sense, they operate like us.
It could be a problem that we have and we're not aware of (Or we're totally in denial). And a forum like this we will start feeding and enable each other, thus compounding the problem.
Yes. Forums can help pushing people buy more than they need. Fortunately, my collecting objectives are such that I myself can push me into buying more than any of you can.
I am not into my first collection (you too). Before, it was: Stamps, Coins, Books, perfumes and...Vintage laptops (Linux user with emacs as my window manager EXWM). I am in a razor phase.
To how big of a length would we go to justify what we did or still doing?
The length is as long as our objectives.
Putting a clear purpose an clear guidelines and most importantly knowing the difference between the two (I am not sure you do, please don't get triggered, this is just a productive conversation) will give meaning and a direction to the collection. It will have a clearly defined theme. Too broad and you're just a hoarder with issues that you either deny or diminish.
I agree I am a hoarder, however I do have objectives and ALWAYS compare my buying "needs" with those objectives. And everything lower in the hierarchy will only get looked at when the above levels are empty.
I won't be increasing my collection beyond a certain size. My defined objectives in variety will be achieved with an extra 50 razors max, I might settle at 20. Once done the display will be increase accordingly and I will start the tweaking phase.
Size is not an objective. When I collect slants, as some of you know I do, I try to find ALL slants in ALL variants. I've no idea how many exist. My wantlist has those I know exist, however I am regularly confronted with items not on my wantlist but fitting the collection.
So basically, get what you think fits. Anything other is too subjective, and getting what you think fits in itself is subjective too.
Example: collect the 10 most innovative razors produced. We can spend thread after thread discussing whether or not a razor fits.
The tweaking phase will include the following:
- Complete sets with missing items like blade banks, blades, strops etc...
- Clean razors and boxes to the best I can.
- Replace certain damaged razors or boxes.
- Sell, exchange and replace redundant or less desirable items.
The tweaking phase can start before I complete my razor purchases.
Tweaking is a thing that is ongoing. All the time. Whenever you can improve quality, improve quality. Exception: when faced with the choice between a better specimen of a razor I own, or a model I do not own, regardless of condition, I go for the latter.
I collect because I like cool vintage SE razors to shave with. It feels good.
Those SE I shaved with are terrific.
I have no goals when collecting. I just do. It happens.
I LOVE this.
I try to stick to a very strict budget: £20 per razor. Anything more expensive and I need to have a strict word with myself first.
That has reduced my collecting activities to about three razors a year. I think I'm not too obsessive.
This is really amazing. It means you have to dive under EVERYBODIES radar. I'd like to learn how you do that.
My end game? No clue. There is no game, let alone an end game.
I translate that to my situation: the status quo is I buy razors. No idea how it ends.
No one will ever accuse my of being a serious collector. I'm just a geek.
There's a reason we love you ;-)