Hello,
I know some people don´t like the terms vintage or antique or old when used for coticules, mined quite a time ago. They say "this hone is about 480 Million vears old, so why call it vintage?" But ultimately, anything is made out of something older. Chairs and tables are made out of trees that are 100 years old and older. Ore is millions and millions of years old. Nobody says "don´t call that diamond ring vintage, the diamond is like billions of years old".
So, why is it wrong, calling a coticule, that was mined, selected and cut hundreds of years ago "vintage"? Is it the amount of work, stuck into it? Or is it the idea of "removing just the unnecessary parts" or something? There is a coticule with a silver ring attached to it (I think, you´ve seen it, too). Is it "allowed" to call that one vintage? Or the ones attached to an old paddle strop? I personally don´t get it. That´s why I will continue using the term "vintage"
Best regards,
Tok
I know some people don´t like the terms vintage or antique or old when used for coticules, mined quite a time ago. They say "this hone is about 480 Million vears old, so why call it vintage?" But ultimately, anything is made out of something older. Chairs and tables are made out of trees that are 100 years old and older. Ore is millions and millions of years old. Nobody says "don´t call that diamond ring vintage, the diamond is like billions of years old".
So, why is it wrong, calling a coticule, that was mined, selected and cut hundreds of years ago "vintage"? Is it the amount of work, stuck into it? Or is it the idea of "removing just the unnecessary parts" or something? There is a coticule with a silver ring attached to it (I think, you´ve seen it, too). Is it "allowed" to call that one vintage? Or the ones attached to an old paddle strop? I personally don´t get it. That´s why I will continue using the term "vintage"
Best regards,
Tok