During the preparatory research for this study, it was discovered that this hint of slurry yielded better results on the BBW with this particular procedure than the use of pure water. It is speculated that, with water only, the BBW is too slow to undo the slight bevel tip deterioration that any passage over the microscopically uneven surface of a hone will cause. The ability to make up for that deterioration and add refinement to a point where it can do no more is the difference between a “whet”stone and a just a stone. It seems that the BBW, when used with water only, on hardened razor steel, flirts with that distinction.
While it can be considered an advantage for edge finishing when a hone sneaks up very slowly to its maximized keenness limit, it remains important that it offers enough abrasion to undo its own – however slight – deteriorating effect on the tip of the edge.
Otherwise, one ends up with beautifully polished bevel sides that meet at a disappointing edge radius. To avoid all possible problems in this regard, it was decided to finish on the BBW with the thinnest possible slurry, as this clearly improves the abrasive properties of the hone without introducing the disadvantages of a dense slurry.
To further avoid any possible influence of the bevel tip collision with the garnets in the slurry, the finishing strokes were performed in an edge trailing direction. More research is required to investigate the exact influence of various slurry densities on the BBW and the difference between edge leading/edge trailing passes during the final stages of sharpening.