G
Guest
My, my, what an interesting thread. Two things: 1. I think personal issues with any member of another forum should be settled there; 2. Bashing SRP is too easy to be fun.
ad 1. Thankfully, both big forums have installed badges to make a member's vendor status transparent. Whether anyone is willing to accept advice from somebody with a vested interest is up to that person. And there is a balance to be struck. Someone making money with a certain knowledge or skill in a tightly knit, small community must be reasonably good at what he's doing. At least in theory. I practice, evaluating the edge of a razor (to keep the example simple) is an exercise in personal preference. Bart has honed many razors for me, and there is at least one that he likes a lot, and I do not. Does that mean Bart is bad at honing? No. Does that mean that even the best honer is infallible? No. What it means is, quite simply, that there are many contributing factors to a successful shave, and the razor itself isn't even the most important in my opinion.
However, being infallible is crucial where there is predatory competition. SRP makes little pretence of its support of a small group of individuals who are said to be exceedingly good at certain aspects of straight razor shaving. B&B gives its pushers and enablers much more leeway by comparison. While I do not approve of SRP's handling of marketeers, it is relatively free of them. B&B, on the other hand, employs far more devious practices to keep their moderators' cronies happy. I cordially invite anyone to peruse this thread in all its glory.
ad 2. SRP is very big. If you don't like certain aspects, leave. It is too big to be changed, and if you think its drawbacks (of which there are some) outweigh its uses (of which there are many), leave.
It really is that simple. But bashing certain of its members here does not change anything over there while spoiling the mood here. I don't think that's such a great idea.
Regards,
Robin
ad 1. Thankfully, both big forums have installed badges to make a member's vendor status transparent. Whether anyone is willing to accept advice from somebody with a vested interest is up to that person. And there is a balance to be struck. Someone making money with a certain knowledge or skill in a tightly knit, small community must be reasonably good at what he's doing. At least in theory. I practice, evaluating the edge of a razor (to keep the example simple) is an exercise in personal preference. Bart has honed many razors for me, and there is at least one that he likes a lot, and I do not. Does that mean Bart is bad at honing? No. Does that mean that even the best honer is infallible? No. What it means is, quite simply, that there are many contributing factors to a successful shave, and the razor itself isn't even the most important in my opinion.
However, being infallible is crucial where there is predatory competition. SRP makes little pretence of its support of a small group of individuals who are said to be exceedingly good at certain aspects of straight razor shaving. B&B gives its pushers and enablers much more leeway by comparison. While I do not approve of SRP's handling of marketeers, it is relatively free of them. B&B, on the other hand, employs far more devious practices to keep their moderators' cronies happy. I cordially invite anyone to peruse this thread in all its glory.
ad 2. SRP is very big. If you don't like certain aspects, leave. It is too big to be changed, and if you think its drawbacks (of which there are some) outweigh its uses (of which there are many), leave.
It really is that simple. But bashing certain of its members here does not change anything over there while spoiling the mood here. I don't think that's such a great idea.
Regards,
Robin