Bart Well-Known Member Nov 14, 2010 #81 OK. I found it. You're correct, I meant n°57, instead of n°58. My apologies for that. Kind regards, Bart.
OK. I found it. You're correct, I meant n°57, instead of n°58. My apologies for that. Kind regards, Bart.
J jfdupuis Well-Known Member Nov 14, 2010 #82 Thanks! I was just going through some of my old post to determine my stone's properties and how it might react through the dilucot method. Again thank you ! JF
Thanks! I was just going through some of my old post to determine my stone's properties and how it might react through the dilucot method. Again thank you ! JF